Oh yes they should, if you
don’t want them to hug each other, chat nonstop, then together, with arms
around each other, collaboratively choose right or wrong answers!
In so many ways, the
facilitation of a conducive environment, in which blended learning could succeed, eluded the mindset of our first grade teachers by conflicting with their vision and
philosophical beliefs of what a first grade, developmentally
appropriate classroom, should look like, as well as how a first grader
should, ultimately, learn.
In previous years, (many, many previous years), the first graders were conditioned to collectively engage, in every way, every day. It was a rarity to separate one student from another using walls, then require a six year old to focus on a computer program for 10-15 minutes, without talking.
In previous years, (many, many previous years), the first graders were conditioned to collectively engage, in every way, every day. It was a rarity to separate one student from another using walls, then require a six year old to focus on a computer program for 10-15 minutes, without talking.
Perhaps the practice of segregating young children, for the purpose of providing adaptable data driven, differentiated instruction, is developmentally inappropriate. One thing, however, is certain, when children perform in isolation there is a high chance of acquiring authentic results of a student's acquisition, or not, of grade level required
skills.
Because the first grade
teachers had the most difficulty accepting the nature of isolated, independent
workspaces, used over an extended time, their student data results were the
least comprehensive of all the grade levels.
Were the first grade teachers
correct in their strong beliefs that isolation in cubicles was not
developmentally appropriate for first graders? Perhaps. Although, the
kindergarten teachers trained their students, from day one, to put up their
desk walls and focus on what they needed to do.
Successfully proving that conditioning can produce extremely focused
participation in very young children. Was it the best use of the 5 year olds’
learning time? The question still remains.
Will the lack of first grade
digitally generated student data be detrimental in the educational development
of the first grade students?
Not if the teachers were able
to promptly identify individual needs and propel learning at an appropriate
pace through differentiated instruction….so much easier said, than done!
Alas, first grade teachers, this is the benefit of blended learning.
Maybe next year, they'll try again!
No comments:
Post a Comment